Twitter

Sunday, December 27, 2015

Audio and Essays Parashat Shmot

Audio and Essays Parashat Shmot


New Echoes of Eden Project:

We Are Family


Audio shiurim


The Book of Shmot an Introduction:

The Redeemers

A Sign Of Redemption

A new King - who Forgot Yosef (5772)

Recreating The World

Regaining Innocence

Shmot Moshes Delay Vaeira Burning Bush

Straw (advanced)

Straw (basic)

The Development Of Moshe

The Leadership Of Moshe

Shmot - a Brief Overview What Is FREEDOM

Why Moshe Was Chosen

Sefer Shmot and the Confusing Chronology

Who Forgot - and Who Remembered Yosef? (5773)

The Metamorphosis of Moshe

The Choice of Moshe as Leader

Haftorah

Essays:

Redemption Song

A New Book, An Old Story 


Moshe: The Emergence of a Leader

Collecting Straw

Born to Lead

Fathers and Sons

Moses' Stop
New Book:


Monday, December 21, 2015

Parashat Vayechi 5776 Love and Loss

Echoes of Eden
Rabbi Ari Kahn
Parashat Vayechi 5776
Love and Loss

In the words of the great poet Alfred Tennyson,

'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.[1]

Almost any person who lives long enough will experience and suffer loss; it is an inescapable fact of the human condition. Modern scholarship recognizes five distinct stages of loss and mourning: Denial, anger, bargaining, and depression must be experienced before acceptance is a possibility.[2]  And yet, though the process may be universal, the individuals response to loss is far less uniform: So many factors come into play, and so many different types of loss may be experienced at different stages of a persons life, generating very different responses.

Our Patriarch Yaakov suffered and endured a great deal of loss. First, he lost the comfort and tranquility of his childhood home when he was forced to flee his brothers murderous fury. In retrospect, this loss paled in comparison to the death of loved ones that Yaakov subsequently endured: He lost the love of his life, Rachel, when she died in childbirth. He mourned the loss of his son Yosef, the son of Rachel, for decades. Both of these losses were devastating, cruel, swift: He was unprepared for the death of his young wife and of his seventeen-year-old son.

How did Yaakov cope with these catastrophes? Others might have crumbled under the weight of these tragedies. Indeed, when Pharaoh asks Yaakov his age, Yaakov  responds:

'My journey through life has lasted 130 years,' replied Yaakov. 'The days of my life have been few and hard. I did not live as long as my fathers did during their pilgrimage through life.' (Bereishit 47:7)

In Yaakovs words, first to his sons, then to Pharaoh, and, eventually directly to Yosef, we hear the pain that he has lived through and the loss he has endured. His beloved wife had died suddenly; from the moment he had met her, all Yaakov ever really wanted was to marry Rachel and to live out their days together. His son Yosef, who replaced Rachel in Yaakovs heart, was wrested from him, leaving Yaakov bereft and emotionally alone. And yet, as traumatic as these devastating losses were, they may not have been what Yaakov had in mind when he described to Pharaoh the misery he had experienced. These losses are not unknown in this world; they are, in a sense, a cruel but not unusual part of life. Hard as it was for Yaakov to bear, the loss of his loved ones was not what shook him to his very core. Yaakov had loved and lost; he could cling to the memories of Rachel and Yosef, take comfort in Binyamin, enjoy the company of his other wives, children and grandchildren. He could focus on the time he had spent with Rachel and of his special relationship with Yosef; more generally, he could take pride in what he had achieved, rather than focusing on what was lacking in his life.

Even Tennyson, the poet who grappled with the sudden loss of someone so dear to him and so central to his life, [3] was able to draw solace from this aspect of love lost. From the depths of his own mourning, Tennyson chose to change his focus, and to cherish the time he had shared with his friend Arthur Hallam rather than succumb to the raw, biting pain of loss.

Yaakov had experienced an additional type of loss, and it was this other pain that tormented his days, his nights, his years: Yaakov had experienced estrangement from God Himself. When Yaakov ran away from Esav, when he lost his home, his property, his entire family, God had been with him. God spoke to him, reassured him, promised not to abandon him. Years later, when Yaakov extricated himself from the house of Lavan and started to make his way back home, God spoke to him, guided him and shored up his courage. Yaakov had an intimate relationship with God; he spoke to Him in his hour of darkness and fear as he prepared to confront Esav, and brought Him offerings of thanksgiving after the ordeal was over. And yet, when Yaakovs life was torn asunder by the disappearance of Yosef, God was silent. For decades, Yaakov was left to face his grief alone, without Gods words of reassurance or comfort that he so sorely craved. When Yosef exits the stage, God ceases to communicate with Yaakov. For Yaakov, the loss of his son is compounded by Gods silence; this loss, unlike the other pain that he had experienced, was unnatural, impossible to understand. It was a sense of loss that reflected something so profoundly wrong that Yaakov was inconsolable.

The loss of a loved one is painful, but to suffer Gods silence is a completely different experience. The loved one is gone, yet God continues to exist; He chooses not to communicate. Can we say to a person who has experienced intimacy with God such as Yaakov did, that it is better to have been a prophet and lose the ability to prophesize than never to have heard the voice of God at all? Can a prophet take solace in the fact that he knows with certainty that God exists and communicates with man, that He is involved in human history and takes a personal interest in each and every aspect of our lives and not be anything less than devastated when prophecy is suddenly, inexplicably denied? Is the loss of this gift of intimacy too spiritually devastating for any man or woman to bear?

When Yaakov is informed that Yosef is, in fact, alive, his prophetic ability returns; Yaakov comes to life once again. His spiritual world is rehabilitated. The intimacy with God is restored. Only then is Yaakov able to make sense of what has happened. He is granted the insight that is only possible from Gods perspective of history insight that Yosef was granted all along. Yosef lives, and God speaks; Yaakovs world, which had been upended, is set right.

 And then, once again, Yaakov is thrust into darkness. On his deathbed, Yaakov intends to share this Divine perspective with his children, to draw a line from the past, through the present, to the future. He is eager to include them in the intimacy with God that he has regained, but this intimacy is suddenly denied. Yaakov once again must endure the loss of Divine communication, and Gods silence terrifies him. He searches the faces of his children with fear: Could they, perhaps, be unworthy of sharing Divine intimacy?

Rabbinic tradition teaches us that in this moment of fear and dread, Yaakovs children cry out in unison: Shma Yisrael - Hashem Elokeinu Hashshem Echad Hear oh Israel (our father): God is our Lord, God is One.[4] Yaakov now gains a new type of understanding, a more human sort of insight: This time, Gods silence is not a punishment but an act of tenderness and consideration. God is silent, not because Yaakovs children are unworthy of prophecy, but because they are worthy of Gods kindness:  Sometimes, we are better off not knowing exactly what the future holds, and yet, despite this, when and even more importantly, when our children say the Shma we know that God is with us.

For a more in-depth analysis see:




[1] Alfred Tennyson, “In Memoriam A.H.H.”
[2] See Elisabeth Kubler-Ross On Death and Dying, (Routledge 1969), Elisabeth Kubler-Ross and David Kessler, On Grief and Grieving (NY: Simon and Shuster, 2005).
[3] Despite many a lover taking solace in the words of Tennyson, “In Memoriam A.H.H” was written for his dear friend and fellow poet Arthur Hallam, who had been engaged to marry Tennyson’s sister Emily but died unexpectedly at the age of twenty two.
[4] Talmud Bavli Pesachim 56a.

Echoes of Eden

Sunday, December 20, 2015

Audio and Essays Parashat Vayechi

Audio and Essays Parashat Vayechi

New Echoes of Eden Project:
Love and Loss

Audio shiurim

Berishit; a Book Review



The Deaths of Yakov and Esav



Parshat Vayechi / The Deaths of Yakov and Esav

Parshat Vayechi / The Order Of The Brachot

Parshat Vayechi / The Shema

Parshat Vayechi / Yosef An Extension Of Yaacov


Essays:
Parshat Vayechi/ Take Me Home

An Inconclusive Conclusion

Father and Son

Salvation

Conclusions

Who Are These?

The Death of Jacob


Sunday, December 13, 2015

Parashat Vayigash 5776 Seeing a Ghost


Echoes of Eden
Rabbi Ari Kahn
Parashat Vayigash 5776
Seeing a Ghost

They never saw it coming: The dramatic, unexpected end to the saga in which they were embroiled was the last thing the brothers anticipated - and that was precisely the problem. The scrutiny to which they had been subjected seemed unwarranted. Why, of all the visitors who came to Egypt to purchase food, had they been singled out? Why the interest in their family, their father, their brother Binyamin?

When they attempt to return the money that had mysteriously turned up in their bags, the brothers’ misinterpretation of the events that had transpired in Egypt becomes clear: They convince themselves that everything that had happened was part of a plot to rob them of their possessions and their freedom.

When the men [realized that] they were being brought to Yosef's palace, they were terrified. They said, 'We are being brought here because of the money that was put back in our packs the last time. We are being framed and will be convicted, our donkeys will be confiscated, and we might be taken as slaves.' (Bereishit 43:18)

Had they thought things through more calmly and rationally, they might have asked themselves why the second-most powerful man in Egypt would need some paltry excuse to seize their meager possessions; moreover, the Egyptian ruler’s modus operandi - placing his own money in their bags - seems strange and counter-intuitive: Had the Egyptian wanted to keep their donkeys, he could have left all of the brothers in prison, rather than freeing them after three days, and their donkeys and very lives would have been his.

Apparently, the human mind has a powerful capacity to rationalize, justify and fabricate alternative explanations to the obvious when the simple truth is too difficult to face. In flagrant disregard for Occam’s Razor[1], the brothers built intricate and improbable hypotheses to explain their predicament. Had they been able or willing to open their eyes, they would have saved themselves so much confusion, fear and angst. Their adversary was not a stranger; they had known him their entire lives, but were unable or unwilling to recognize him. The obvious solution eluded them, because in their minds it was impossible in so many ways. This person could not possibly be Yosef: Yosef was a dreamer, with no grasp of reality. Yosef was probably not even alive: As a slave, Yosef must have annoyed his master to the point that he did what the brothers themselves could not. On the other hand, who other than Yosef would have cared about their youngest brother and their father? Who else had any reason to throw them in prison? Who else cared enough to carry on this protracted game of wits, to maintain contact only to continue to threaten and abuse them?

The brothers never dreamed that they would bow to Yosef; ironically, when they finally did bow before him, the brothers were unaware that Yosefs dreams had come to fruition: They did not know that it was Yosef to whom they bowed. They bowed to the man who controlled all the food in Egypt; in a very real sense, they had not bowed to Yosef, but to a strange Egyptian potentate. They never dreamed that this was their own brother.

The Midrash offers a more detailed account of the moments in which Yosef finally revealed himself to his brothers: At first, Yosef told them that their missing brother, the brother they had claimed was dead, was in fact very much alive. The brothers were stunned, incredulous. Yosef then assured them that this long-lost brother was in the palace; in fact, he told them, I will call him and he will appear before your eyes. He called out, Yosef son of Yaakov, come to me! Yosef son of Yaakov, show yourself! The brothers scanned every corner of the room, searching for Yosef, until Yosef finally declared, I am Yosef - and the brothers (almost) died. (Bereishit Rabbah 93:9)

Even when they are told that Yosef is in the room, they look everywhere - except at the man who stands before them.

Sometimes, jealousy and hatred can be so strong that we underestimate the person who is the object of our hatred. By belittling their worth, we justify our own bad behavior. Because the brothers hated Yosef, they could not see the truth - even as it stared directly at them. When they were finally forced to recognize Yosef, they were dumbfounded, shocked almost to death. As if struck by lightning or confronted by a ghost, that moment of enlightenment forced them to recognize their many crimes.

They had hated their brother for no reason. Yosef had not been suffering from delusions of grandeur; he was, and always had been, capable of greatness. They suspected him of vanity and a false sense of superiority, but it was they who suffered from myopathy: They could not, or would not, see what was, and always had been, right in front of them. In the end, they had bowed to him, just as he had dreamed they would. They relied on him for sustenance, as his dream foretold. They understood, too, that if revenge was on his mind, he was certainly in a position to do anything he wished to them, and not merely take their few donkeys.

In one dazzling moment, the brothers world was turned upside down. They were not victims, as they had imagined, of this mans abuse; they themselves were the abusers. They might tell their story, and perhaps even garner sympathy from anyone and everyone else but there was one person in the world who was not fooled. They might have taken comfort in self-pity and self-righteousness had they been standing before any other accuser, but the man who stood before them was Yosef, the one person who knew their darkest secret, the person who had been their victim, the brother they had put out of their minds for so many years. Yehudahs impassioned speech, so full of righteous indignation, suddenly seemed hollow, even laughable. Now, they were forced to remember: They had another brother, he was in the room, staring right at them, and he was everything they had tried to deny: Yosef was a visionary, a man of unparalleled talents and strengths, a man of the highest moral caliber. He had risen far above them in every way, but he was willing to go even further, to do the unimaginable: Yosef was willing to forgive them.


Echoes of Eden




[1] Occam’s (or Ockham’s) Razor states that among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected. In other words, the most straightforward explanation is usually correct.